Recent content by MRHP
-
-
-
Happy Birthday 409 Chevy Performance
Happy Birthday Jack! Hang in there.- MRHP
- Post #2
- Forum: Announcements
-
-
409 crank
Wasn’t the rear flange a different shape on the 61 cranks? Or am I remembering it wrong?- MRHP
- Post #19
- Forum: 348 and 409 Engines
-
1962 Impala with 409 vs without
Excellent info here.- MRHP
- Post #31
- Forum: 1958-1965 Full size Chevrolet
-
348 engine
The 702 heads are the least desirable head due to small runners and bowl area. Not good for any performance application other than stock.- MRHP
- Post #5
- Forum: General car talk
-
-
1962 Impala with 409 vs without
Unless you have an extra vin tag in the passenger door jamb from Mexico that lists the engine info and vin……… like mine- MRHP
- Post #27
- Forum: 1958-1965 Full size Chevrolet
-
-
-
-
-
Scorpion rocker arms.
And…….the Scorpion rockers have been flawless in my engine for over 20 years.- MRHP
- Post #6
- Forum: 348 and 409 Engines
-
409 intake question
Just like head bolts, I seal them all. I like the fact of using the same process on all bolts being torqued on an item. Same sealer on all bolts equates to the same torque on all the bolts. Might be a bit of overthinking it, but I have always done it that.- MRHP
- Post #4
- Forum: 348 and 409 Engines