The 583 head had deeper pockets for the valve springs because the #7735 cam had more lift.It took taller springs than the #690 heads could accommodate. There was a Chevrolet service bulletin that came out in '64 that explained all that. The proper camshaft for the '62 engine was carried over into '63 and the very early '64 400-425 engines,then in November "63 a running change took place that superseded the 690 cam and the 690 head. Interesting that the 62-early 64 400-425 cam was part #3830690, and the proper head was 3814690. Easy to remember. The 583 heads,valves and springs would work with a 690 cam, but don't try an assembled 690 head with the #735 cam, the lift is too high and will coil bind the springs. I don't even want to think of the problems that would cause. I built a 409 for myself where I used big block Chevy stainless steel valves, big block Chevy springs and a Crane #151181 mechanical cam . I used a stock 409 intake push rod and a stock 396-427 exhaust push rod. Seemed to work well with OEM 409 rocker arms, now you'd use good quality roller rockers. If you use the #7735 second design 409 cam with the 690 head,you have to go with these parts.I did it about 30 years ago.Also on some engines,varying the push rod length can increase or decrease the valve lift.Be careful out there!