348 assembly

nana1962409

Well Known Member
Supporting Member 2
Now that looks familiar! I did the same thing when I was getting mine ready setup and built my own intake. I used large port heads so I started with a factory dual quad intake for my base. It wasn’t the prettiest thing when done but it worked. I thing all the small port blower intakes made are based off the offy intake
 

Hods1222

Well Known Member
Any pics of your setup? Any advice for someone heading down this particular road? I had also read somewhere on here that a 440 Chrysler manifold had the right port spacing just needed the flanges reworked for angle/bolt holes.
 

427John

Well Known Member
So I may be getting a little ahead of myself but I mocked up the heads with the huffer on top of a 409 manifold I have. It seems a blower manifold for these engines is as scarce as proverbial hens teeth. Since I have a 3 axis VMC at my disposal and an ac tig welder I was thinking of machining/welding up my own custom manifold. Anyone have any experience in doing this? Is there a good manifold to start from? I had heard that back in the day blower manifolds were made from an offy manifold to suit the bill.
I could see where the offy manifolds would be favored as a starting point,with their low profile single level design.I've seen examples where they milled a flat surface to mount the pop off valve chamber to,bored thru the top of the plenum to match the bottom of the chamber and the only welding was basically for any bolt bosses needed to mount it.
 

Hods1222

Well Known Member
Alright. I went and picked up my crank today and everything looks great. While they were balancing it I had them cut the 2nd keyway in. You were right about the pistons being heavy as they had to put 2 slugs in to balance it out. The journals just took a polish and I should be able to run standard bearings. I assume the the specs are the same as a bbc with the mains at .0025 - .0033 and the rods at .0022 - .0027. Any recommendations on clearances/bearings to help this live with the blower?
 

Hods1222

Well Known Member
I put the main bearings in last night and the rod bearings will go in tonight. I went with mahle cb743h tri metal bearings and the clearances are in the .0022-.0025 range with the rear at .003. I will probably set my sights on the cam and lifters next. Do you guys recommend grooving the lifter bores to guard against lobe failure? I attached a pic from a David vizard book I have on building BBCs.
 

Attachments

  • 20201222_131936.jpg
    20201222_131936.jpg
    59 KB · Views: 46

Don Jacks

Well Seasoned Member
Supporting Member 3
If you're going flat tappet,it wouldn't hurt but since that book was written there have improvements such as oiling holes and or grooves added to some lifters that do the same thing.If you're going roller it's not needed.
 

Hods1222

Well Known Member
I had some shop time today and was able to get the rotating assembly put together. Now to get a cam coming and an oil pump so I can button up this bottom end and put the pan on. Since this is going into a belair, I am probably going to have to modify the pan to clear the drag link, either that or bite the bullet and get a stefs pan for it.
 

Attachments

  • 20201226_163152.jpg
    20201226_163152.jpg
    70.2 KB · Views: 67
  • 20201226_163139.jpg
    20201226_163139.jpg
    84.2 KB · Views: 65

Hods1222

Well Known Member
The one I have looks to be from a 409, it has the dipstick on the passenger side unless the 348 truck ones were on the passenger side. I picked up a melling drive shaft from summit so I should we good to go on that one. Which pump would you guys recommend?
 

63 dream'n

Well Seasoned Member
Supporting Member 4
I’m sure the smart guys will chime in here soon Ronnie Russell used to always say that there was nothing wrong with the 409 oiling system .......But they’re always used to be problems with ordering the oil pump that they would always send the small block Chevy driveshaft with it and the 409 or the W motor is specific
 

Don Jacks

Well Seasoned Member
Supporting Member 3
Get with Show Cars and get the correct part now.If the shaft that you have now came in the box with the pump you have the wrong shaft,,it's too short.The Melling M-55 will work fine.
 

Hods1222

Well Known Member
Hey Don, I came across this cam and wanted to get your take on it. I am looking to run BBC roller rockers with it which will decrease the lift a little. Will the .505 intake lift be compatible with my stock valve notches?
 

Attachments

  • 20201228_112112.jpg
    20201228_112112.jpg
    72.3 KB · Views: 26

Don Jacks

Well Seasoned Member
Supporting Member 3
It'll be suitable from that stand point but the intake to exhaust is too wide.Call Howards cams and have them copy these spec's;lobe seperation-113,lobe centerline-109,;lift-.519 in.,.525 exhaust,Duration at ..050 218in.,224 ex.This is a proven grind in a 380[ask MRHP] and will work on a 348 just fine.I would not exceed 220 duration intake at .050 on one of these engines without notching,ugly things can happen if you do.
 
Top