1911: or someone?. It's my understanding that ALL 350 FOUR BARREL truck engines were 4 bolt AND had a forged crank to boot. I don't know beyond 77 as far as the forged crank is concerned. All the ads I see today for the "up to '87" 350 crate engine do not mention a core charge, as in NONE I've seen. But I've never bought one (a friend did for replacing a 305 in a Monte SS). I'd like to have more input here.
400's: In 1988 I built a 400 for a 1979 Malibu I had. 1976 engine, 61,000 miles. Put in a Comp Cams 268h cam with a 108 centerline (they changed it later to 110), Wiend 8004 duel plane, Holley 600 vac, headers and not much else. The car was a complete DOG!. So much so I didn't even want to drive it (and I had done the body, interior, was a nice car). Well I decided to dump the car so I built a mild 307, put that in and pulled the 400.
A year later I bought a shorty C10 "box" (van), painted it a chocolet brown, did a homemade conversion, turned out pretty nice. But it had a 6 so because I was going to tow with it I decided to put the "dog" 400 in it, also with headers. Finished the conversion, my mechanic buddy and I took it out on the street, punched it, and our eyes got the size of saucers!. IT RAN!. The malibu scaled at 3400 lbs, the van at 4400 lbs. The Malibu would SOMETIMES run a low 10 (1/8th), usually high ten. DOG!. The van did 10 flats on a bad day, high 9's on a good one. After a couple of years driving it I ran it at Maple Grove at a Super Chevy, 15.30's/15.40's at 90mph. Now this was a 2 ton plus BRICK!.
Why?. Well call me stupid, I never changed or thought about the rear end in the 'bu, which was either a 2.41 or 2.29! (it had a 267 to start). The van had a 3.08. What if I had put a 3.55 or 3.73 in it?. One like that ran 9 flat's or better.
And I could put a 3300 lb Corvette on an open trailer anad it would tow like it wasn't there. That engine all dirty and oily sits on a stand in my garage, it'll go in SOMETHING someday!.
OK, now when I pulled the original 2 barrel intake off I pulled the fitting for the heater hose, guess what, it almost TOTALLY blocked the thermostat crossover!. I never saw one as long, before or since. 400's had cooling problems?. This MIGHT have been one of the problems, it's something I'd like to check on other motors. In my case I ran a 5 blade thermofan (stock from the six), and a 3 core radiator with SIXTEEN fins per inch. My radiator shop recommended it for towing, said fins per inch were more important than a 4 core. In any event, with a 180 thermostat I never had an overheating problem towing, hot or cold out, up or down hills, never. I think the over heating "story" was just that, a bad rap on 400's.
I have another 400 in my wife's 79 Vette, which had an L-82 in it. This one has a Edlebrock Performer, 750 3310, Comp Cams 270, S/R Torquer heads and headers. It has 3.08 gears and a T350 with a 56-5700 shift point built in. With the L-82 it ran 9.30's/.40's. With the 400 the best I could get was a 8.70, with no consistancy. The L-82 would go 99mph, the 400 98. Why?. I'll find out, right now I think it's in the exhaust, which is only 2" (it should be 2 1/2). I'll replace that with the correct 2 and 1/2 with Flowmasters. Then take a hard look at the fuel system.
Long stories, anyway, if you put a 400 in ANYTHING treat it like a big block, because it is. That means 2 1/2 inch exhaust AT LEAST with efficient mufflers. 3/8th's fuel line a minimum, and put a 3.08 gear or better in it, 3.55 would be a GOOD gear, with a 2000 converter.
PS: with the price of cranks what they are today, if you haven't got a 400 and your going to rebuild the engine don't bother, put a SCAT crank in a 350 and build a 383.