Did Cragar make a 348-409 small port for a blower? Looks fabricated to me.

1964SuperStocker

Well Known Member
Supporting Member 3
Seen this on Facebook and the owner claims its cast from Cragar but all of the fab work leads me to think its just fabricated. Anyone have one of these factory cast pieces we can see some better photos of? Looks like someone took a BBC and did some good fab work to me.

431594866_7569367739741091_2132911954729672634_n.jpg
431572290_7569367833074415_6356842164875312514_n.jpg
431543158_7569367779741087_2975411745927120183_n.jpg
 

1964SuperStocker

Well Known Member
Supporting Member 3
I don’t get the ports not being devided! Its a rare piece for sure for small port heads but if i were gonna put a blower on my car for the money I’d buy a McQuillan
Keep in mind we don't always do what makes the most sense. These intakes were clearly popular enough that only a handful exist apparently. Still a neat piece historically.
 

Ishiftem

Well Known Member
Supporting Member 2
Many of the early intakes had no internal runners, they were basically just large plenums. The Eddie 6x2 I got from Tom K is made that way and I have seen a lot of Offies of different flavors that were pretty much open inside. Not sure what that would do to the distribution.
With a roots blower it isn’t that bad. For a NA application it’s death!
 

boxerdog

Well Known Member
Supporting Member 5
With a roots blower it isn’t that bad. For a NA application it’s death!
I can see that...I'm guessing with things like the 6x2, they rightfully assumed that most anything they might think of doing would make it worse, so keep it simple.
 
Top