First, the Tonowanda production records for 1961 MY production from June 1960 to July 25, 1961 show a total of 265 complete RPO 580 engines shipped broken down by part numbers as:
3795507 Pass LD RPO 580 115
3814301 Pass LD RPO 580 150
total 265
Additionally, 84 RPO 580 "Half Motor"s, part no. 3799347 were shipped.
I assume these were either fitted blocks or long blocks. Fitted blocks would not have an assembly stamp, but I'm not sure if long blocks would, or not.
The end of production records very definitively state the number of engines shipped by 7/7/61, as well as the number stored & on hand 7/7/61 and the number produced from 7/7/61 to the end of production on 7/25/61. All 265 full engines were shipped before 7/7/61 and all half engines had been shipped by 7/25/61 with none left in storage or on hand.
The thing I find interesting from the production records is the two different part numbers for the RPO 580. Obviously 3795507 was the first configuration of only 115 engines and 3814301 was the second version of the engine with 150 produced. What is not known is what the difference is in the two versions of the engine.
Even more confusing is that on 6-8-61, the "1961 W8 Engine Production Identification" list was revised to add two more part numbers and suffix codes still under RPO 580. These were:
High Performance V-8/409 3795507 RPO 580 Suffix Q
Special High Performance V-8 3815223 580 QA
Dual Four Bbl. V-8/409 3815235 580 QB
For me, this is proof of the QA and QB engines were authorized in late production 61 but does not prve that any were actually installed in production.
What is still not clear is why the two new part numbers are not referenced on the total 61 engine production records under the RPO 580 totals. They were authorized, but maybe never built or just missed on the total production by part number summary.
There were also 10 COPO 409 engines shipped under a different part number. Perhaps these were QB engines but the part numbers are different from the 3815235 shown above.