Shaark92
Well Known Member
I think the most difficult part of this decision is knowing ... we don't know/have sufficient information on this vaccine effort.
Before Mid December, all we had were a couple of trials which were exceedingly brief and quite shallow. 10 weeks and 8 weeks (6 of those weeks were concurrent), 37K participants for a brand-new never before attempted vaccine TYPE in the mRNA. Not even any administrations to a single critter. Contrast that to the polio vaccine in the 50s. 1.8 million volunteers participated in a 14 month trial ... of a vaccine type already in widespread use; the Modified Live Virus type.
I want things to return to normal ASAP, too. But I know they are not. So forget about that "druther." 2019 was the last year of something we could have considered normal. We should have used a MLV type virus. The CV19 protein was mapped in early February. now the pharmas couldn't generate the 100s of millions of doses as fast as they have this mRNA thing (cause there is no virus in it), but we didn't need to vaccinate EVERY person on the planet. Only the susceptible.
My opposition to this thing isn't political; I voted for Trump's re-election and supported Tx AG's lawsuit against the thieving election officials in GA, PA, et al.
what will happen when the individual is presented with a challenge from the live virus post inoculation? Will the "vaccine" inhibit the "carrier" condition which has apparently been so problematic??? No studies on that. The trials were strictly on the reaction to the jab itself. nothing else. Now we are seeing California suspend the Moderna product.
last fall, thanks to the spend crazy Fed, my industry received big bucks and that was spent on leaves of absences among other things. I had 3 months of no responsibility to my outfit and was paid about 2/3 of a regular amount. with part of this time, I researched and consulted doctors; incl immunologists. After returning to work, I finished this paper on the covid 19 vaccine from "Warp Speed"
Since then, I have seen news articles declare the vaccine candidates HAVE been tested for "challenge" but I never saw any footnotes to studies on that declaration.
Choose wisely, y'all. A virus which is >99% survivable even with the elderly/susceptible rates included. I think there are FAR too many unknowns and this is being used to manipulate ... not treat for health problems. For the health issue, there are several outstanding homeopathic treatments ... a few which DO require a script.
My plan right now, for subsequent/symptomatic infection is www.budesonideworks.com ... America frontline Doctors is another great source; the HCQ and ivermectin protocols are excellent. Meanwhile, do like momma taught; wash hands before eating & don't lick public toilet seats.
when in doubt ... burnout!
Before Mid December, all we had were a couple of trials which were exceedingly brief and quite shallow. 10 weeks and 8 weeks (6 of those weeks were concurrent), 37K participants for a brand-new never before attempted vaccine TYPE in the mRNA. Not even any administrations to a single critter. Contrast that to the polio vaccine in the 50s. 1.8 million volunteers participated in a 14 month trial ... of a vaccine type already in widespread use; the Modified Live Virus type.
I want things to return to normal ASAP, too. But I know they are not. So forget about that "druther." 2019 was the last year of something we could have considered normal. We should have used a MLV type virus. The CV19 protein was mapped in early February. now the pharmas couldn't generate the 100s of millions of doses as fast as they have this mRNA thing (cause there is no virus in it), but we didn't need to vaccinate EVERY person on the planet. Only the susceptible.
My opposition to this thing isn't political; I voted for Trump's re-election and supported Tx AG's lawsuit against the thieving election officials in GA, PA, et al.
what will happen when the individual is presented with a challenge from the live virus post inoculation? Will the "vaccine" inhibit the "carrier" condition which has apparently been so problematic??? No studies on that. The trials were strictly on the reaction to the jab itself. nothing else. Now we are seeing California suspend the Moderna product.
last fall, thanks to the spend crazy Fed, my industry received big bucks and that was spent on leaves of absences among other things. I had 3 months of no responsibility to my outfit and was paid about 2/3 of a regular amount. with part of this time, I researched and consulted doctors; incl immunologists. After returning to work, I finished this paper on the covid 19 vaccine from "Warp Speed"
Since then, I have seen news articles declare the vaccine candidates HAVE been tested for "challenge" but I never saw any footnotes to studies on that declaration.
Choose wisely, y'all. A virus which is >99% survivable even with the elderly/susceptible rates included. I think there are FAR too many unknowns and this is being used to manipulate ... not treat for health problems. For the health issue, there are several outstanding homeopathic treatments ... a few which DO require a script.
My plan right now, for subsequent/symptomatic infection is www.budesonideworks.com ... America frontline Doctors is another great source; the HCQ and ivermectin protocols are excellent. Meanwhile, do like momma taught; wash hands before eating & don't lick public toilet seats.
when in doubt ... burnout!