Would it be plausible with the late assembly date and this being an 068 block that this was built as a "service" block and the dealer stamped the vin to match the customers car???????
Jeff
Does anyone know of any 409 replacement blocks still in the crate in existance? If you did have one, would you stamp the vin# of the vehicle and the "new" assembly date?Gotta say, all the years I worked for several Chevrolet dealers, we NEVER stamped a replacement block!!
Did not matter, warranty or customer pay.
I wouldn’t.Does anyone know of any 409 replacement blocks still in the crate in existance? If you did have one, would you stamp the vin# of the vehicle and the "new" assembly date?
Does anyone know of any 409 replacement blocks still in the crate in existance? If you did have one, would you stamp the vin# of the vehicle and the "new" assembly date?
One could do that but the date code on the block would not be correct for the original car unless you happened to get a very early block that was cast before the cars build dateDoes anyone know of any 409 replacement blocks still in the crate in existance? If you did have one, would you stamp the vin# of the vehicle and the "new" assembly date?
Correct except that all engines were required to have VIN stamps from 68 on, not 63.please correct me if I am wrong, I was of the understanding that vin's were not stamped on the block pad for 61 model years, but were stamped for 62 model years on the HP 327 and all 409's, and from 63 on all engines.
NO! Flint is and F and 232307 is the last 6 digits of vin....read the Colvin bookYeah if it was added by someone it would be sloppy like the ones in your pics. Second pic is F2 32307 F for flint I'm assuming 2 is model year and the 32307 is vin of car. The pics i provided the serial number is a 330k. To answer about why such late build is shortage of 409s? What plant is L does anyone know